What Are the Main Policy Differences Between the Two Major Political Parties when it comes to Property?

Politics is not always the most relevant or engaging topic when it comes to buying and selling properties. However, with the forthcoming Federal election, there is a factual conversation to be had surrounding the policy differences between the 2 main political parties.

As the election approaches, housing affordability and the broader property market have become key issues for voters. Both major political parties in Australia, the Labor Party and the Coalition, have outlined distinct approaches to addressing challenges in the property sector. These differences reflect their respective priorities and strategies for tackling issues such as home ownership, housing supply, and affordability. Below, we examine the main policy distinctions between these two parties to provide property buyers with a clearer understanding of how each party’s platform may impact the property market.

Labor Party’s Approach to Housing

The Labor Party’s housing policies are centred on direct government intervention to attempt to improve affordability and increase housing supply. Their initiatives focus on providing targeted support for first-home buyers and addressing social housing shortages.

Key Policies

1. Housing Accord: Labor is committed to constructing 1.2 million new homes over five years through its Housing Accord, which involves collaboration with state governments, developers, and institutional investors.
2. Help to Buy Scheme: This shared equity programme allows eligible Australians to purchase a home with government assistance covering up to 40% of the property’s cost. Participants repay the value of this equity share upon selling the property.
3. Housing Australia Future Fund (HAFF): Labor has established a $10 billion fund aimed at building 30,000 affordable homes within five years.
4. Social Housing Initiatives: The government has prioritised increasing social housing stock and expediting construction timelines.
5. Borrowing Adjustments: Labor proposes changes to lending criteria, such as disregarding HECS debts when assessing borrowing capacity, to make it easier for first-home buyers to secure loans.

Objections

While Labor’s policies aim to address affordability directly, critics argue that schemes like Help to Buy could be costly and may not significantly alleviate long-term housing shortages. Critics have also questioned the Government’s role in home ownership. Additionally, some stakeholders question whether the HAFF will deliver its promised outcomes within the proposed timeline.

Coalition’s Approach to Housing

The Coalition takes a market-driven approach to housing policy, focusing on reducing regulatory barriers and incentivising private sector involvement. Their platform emphasises empowering individuals and easing market pressures through supply-side reforms.

Key Policies

1. Superannuation for Housing: The Coalition proposes allowing first-home buyers to access up to $50,000 or 40% of their superannuation savings for a home deposit. This amount must be repaid upon selling the property.
2. Housing Infrastructure Investment: A $5 billion commitment aims to fund essential infrastructure—such as water, power, and sewerage—at greenfield development sites, unlocking up to 500,000 new homes.
3. Reducing Migration Levels: To ease demand on housing supply, the Coalition plans to cut permanent immigration from 185,000 to 140,000 annually for two years and restrict foreign investment in existing homes.
4. Regulatory Reforms: The party pledges to freeze changes to the National Construction Code for ten years and reinstate the Australian Building and Construction Commission (ABCC) to address union-related cost increases in construction.
5. Mortgage Lending Flexibility: The Coalition intends to reduce mortgage serviceability buffers, allowing borrowers greater access to financing.

Objections

The Coalition’s proposal to use superannuation for housing has faced backlash from economists who argue that it could inflate property prices while undermining retirement savings due to lost compounding interest. Additionally, their reduced migration targets have raised concerns about potential labour shortages in critical sectors like construction.

Comparative Analysis

Policy Area	Labor Party	Coalition
Housing Supply	Housing Accord (1.2 million homes in 5 years); HAFF ($10 billion fund)	$5 billion infrastructure investment; unlocking 500,000 homes
First-Home Buyers	Help to Buy scheme; adjusted lending criteria	Superannuation access; reduced lending buffers
Social Housing	Focus on increasing social housing stock	No specific social housing initiatives
Migration Policy	Maintains current migration levels	Reduces migration intake by 25%
Regulatory Reforms	No major reforms	Freezes National Construction Code changes; reinstates ABCC
Foreign Investment	Two year ban on foreign investors purchasing existing homes	Two year ban on foreign investors purchasing existing homes

 

Implications for Property Buyers

For property buyers navigating Sydney’s Inner West or other competitive markets across Australia, these policy differences could influence both short-term opportunities and long-term affordability:

• Labor’s focus on government-backed programmes may provide immediate assistance for some buyers but could face delays in implementation.
• The Coalition’s market-led solutions aim at boosting supply and getting first home buyers on to the property ladder but may inadvertently drive up prices through policies like superannuation access.

Buyers’ agents should closely monitor these developments as they could shape demand dynamics and pricing trends across different segments of the property market.

Do Elections Impact Property Markets?

While elections generate significant discussion around housing policies, research suggests that federal elections have minimal direct impact on property prices or transaction volumes over time. Factors such as interest rates, economic conditions, and supply-demand imbalances tend to play a more significant role in shaping market trends.

However, political uncertainty during election periods can lead to temporary reductions in transaction activity and consequential price discounts as buyers adopt a wait-and-see approach. For buyers considering purchasing a property, engaging a buyer’s agent to unlock real value may be a prudent decision in the current market.

Conclusion

The upcoming federal election presents this time an alternative between two distinct approaches to addressing Australia’s housing challenges. Labor’s interventionist strategies aim at directly tackling affordability through government-backed schemes and social housing investments. In contrast, the Coalition prioritises market-driven solutions designed to empower individuals while easing regulatory burdens.

For property buyers in Sydney’s Inner West and beyond, these policies will likely influence both immediate opportunities and long-term market conditions. As always, working with experienced buyers’ agents can provide invaluable insights into navigating these complexities effectively.